目的 評(píng)價(jià)膀胱灌注表阿霉素預(yù)防表淺性膀胱癌術(shù)后復(fù)發(fā)的療效和副作用.
方法 按文內(nèi)所述納入標(biāo)準(zhǔn),參考Cochrane協(xié)作網(wǎng)工作手冊,計(jì)算機(jī)檢索Medline(1966~2002.9)、EMbase(1985~2002)、Cochrane Library(2002年第4期)和中國生物醫(yī)學(xué)文獻(xiàn)光盤數(shù)據(jù)庫(CBMdisc,1970~2002);手工檢索發(fā)表或未發(fā)表的文獻(xiàn),包括 lt;中華泌尿外科雜志 gt;等12種雜志、中華泌尿外科學(xué)會(huì)組織的學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議論文集(1990~2002)、美國AUA(1995~2002)、歐洲ECCO會(huì)議論文集(1995~2002)和北京大學(xué)等3所大學(xué)學(xué)位論文匯編等.文獻(xiàn)資料用統(tǒng)一的表格由兩名評(píng)價(jià)者獨(dú)立進(jìn)行提取,采用Jadad質(zhì)量計(jì)分法評(píng)價(jià)文獻(xiàn)質(zhì)量,并應(yīng)用Rev-man 4.2軟件進(jìn)行數(shù)據(jù)處理與分析.
結(jié)果 共檢索到文獻(xiàn)213篇,經(jīng)排查后,符合納入標(biāo)準(zhǔn)并進(jìn)入系統(tǒng)評(píng)價(jià)的文獻(xiàn)共10篇,其中3篇屬于高質(zhì)量RCT,其余為低質(zhì)量RCT.Meta分析結(jié)果顯示:表阿霉素膀胱灌注加手術(shù)治療與單純手術(shù)比較,在1年未復(fù)發(fā)方面,RR合并=1.51,95%CI(1.32,1.72);在2年未復(fù)發(fā)方面,RR合并=1.49,95%CI(1.35,1.66);劑量<50 mg/次的表阿霉素膀胱灌注,在術(shù)后復(fù)發(fā)預(yù)防方面,RR合并=1.34,95%CI(1.22,1.48);劑量>50 mg/次的表阿霉素膀胱灌注,在術(shù)后復(fù)發(fā)預(yù)防方面,RR合并=1.63,95%CI(1.48,1.79);單次阿霉素膀胱灌注的術(shù)后1年未復(fù)發(fā)率,RR=1.49,95%CI(1.33,1.66),術(shù)后2年未復(fù)發(fā)率,RR=1.58,95%CI(1.36,1.84);表淺性膀胱癌術(shù)后疾病進(jìn)展率:RR-0.79,95%CI(0.53,1.17);阿霉素膀胱灌注后的總副作用發(fā)生率:RR=4.34,95%CI(2.62,7.19).
結(jié)論 不同劑量的表阿霉素膀胱灌注均可降低表淺性膀胱癌術(shù)后復(fù)發(fā)率;單次表阿霉素膀胱灌注可以降低表淺性膀胱癌術(shù)后復(fù)發(fā)率,但應(yīng)謹(jǐn)慎選擇病例;表阿霉素膀胱灌注對表淺性膀胱癌病情進(jìn)展沒有影響;表阿霉素膀胱灌注可引起一些副作用,但可以耐受,不影響患者正常生活.
引用本文: 彭國輝,魏強(qiáng),關(guān)靜,韓平. 膀胱灌注表阿霉素預(yù)防表淺性膀胱癌術(shù)后復(fù)發(fā)的系統(tǒng)評(píng)價(jià). 中國循證醫(yī)學(xué)雜志, 2004, 04(6): 382-388. doi: 復(fù)制
版權(quán)信息: ?四川大學(xué)華西醫(yī)院華西期刊社《中國循證醫(yī)學(xué)雜志》版權(quán)所有,未經(jīng)授權(quán)不得轉(zhuǎn)載、改編
1. | [25]Cumming JA, Kirk D, Newling DW. A multicentre phase Ⅱ study of intravesical EPI rubicin in the treatment of superficial bladder tumor[J]. Eur Urol, 1990;17(31) :20. |
2. | [1]Lum BL, Torti. Adjuvant intravesical pharmacology for superficial bladder cancer[J]. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1991; 83:682-694. |
3. | [2]Jerome P, Ricie MD. Intravesical chemotherapy treatment selection, techniques and results [J ]. Urological Clinics of North America,1992; 19(3): 521-527. |
4. | [3]Arnling CL. Diagnosis and management of superficial bladder cancer[J], Curr Probl Cancer, 2001; 25(4): 219-278. |
5. | [4]Mulrow CD, Oxman AD. The cochrane Collaboration hand book[ M]. Issue1, 2000, Oxford,Update Sofeware. |
6. | [5]Jadad AR, Moore A, Carroll D. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary[J].Control Clin Trials, 1996; 17:1-12. |
7. | [6]Kjaergard LL, Villumsen J, Gluud C. Quality of randomized clinical trials affects estimates of intervention efficacy[ A]. In:Vll Cochrane Colloquium [C], Rome 1999,p:57. |
8. | [7]Moher D, Pham B, Jones A, Cook DJ, Jadad AR, Moher M.Does quality of reports of randomized trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyes [ J ]. Lancet. 1998; 352(21 ) :609-613. |
9. | [8]Clarke M, Oxman AD. Editors. Cochrane Reviewers Handbook 4.0 [ updated July 1999 ]; Section 6 [ M ]. In: The Cochrane Library[ database on CD/ROM]. The Cochrane Collaboration. Oxford: Update Software, 2000: Issue 1. |
10. | [9]Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Hayes R, Altman D. Empirical evidence of bias[J ]. JAMA, 1995; 273 (35) :408-412. |
11. | [10]Vander Meijden AP, Kurth KH, Oosterlinck W. Intravesical therapy with adriamycin and 4-EPI rubicin for superficial bladder cancer: the experience of the EOR TC GU Group[J].Cancer Chemother Pharmacol, 1992; 30 (Suppl): S95-98. |
12. | [11]Maekawa S, Suzuki H, Ohkubo K. Continuous intravesical instillation of EPI rubicin immediately after transurethral resection of superficial bladder cancer: a prospective controlled study[J]. Hinyokika Kiyo, 2000; 46(5): 301-306. |
13. | [12]Aliel DB, el Baz M, Aly AN. Intravesical EPI rubicin versus doxorubicin for superficial bladder tumors (stages pTa and pT1 ): a randomized prospective study[J]. J Urol, 1997; 158(1): 68-74. |
14. | [13]Aliel DB, Nabeeh A, el Baz M, et al. Single ~ dose versus multiple instillations of EPI rubicin as prophylaxis for recurrence after transurethral resection of pTa and pT1 transitionalcell bladder tumours: a prospective, randomized controlled study[J]. Br J Urol, 1997; 79(5): 731-735. |
15. | [14]Hirao Y, Ozono S, Momose H. Prospective randomized study of prophylaxis of superficial bladder cancer with EPI rubicin: the role of a central pathology laboratory[J]. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol, 1994; 35 Suppl: S36-40. |
16. | [15]Melekos MD, Dauaher H, Fokaefs E. Intravesical instillations of4-EPI-doxorubicin (EPI rubicin) in the prophylactic treatment of superficial bladder cancer: results of a controlled prospective study[J]. J Urol, 1992; 147(2): 371-375. |
17. | [16]Melekos MD, Chionis HS, Paranychianakis GS. Intravesical 4-EPI-doxorubicin (EPI rubicin) versus bacillus Calmette-Guerin. A controlled prospective study on the prophylaxis of superficial bladder cancer[J]. Cancer, 1993; 72(5): 1 749-1755. |
18. | [17]Okamura K, Murase T, Obata K. A randomized trial of early intravesical instillation ofEPI rubicin in uperficial bladder cancer[J]. Cancer ChemotherPharnacol, 1994; Suppl: S31-35. |
19. | [18]Oosterlinck W, Kurth KH, Schroder F. A prospective European Organization for R.esearch and Treatment of Cancer Genitourinary Group randomized trial comparing transurethral resection followed by a single intravesical instillation of EPI rubicin or water in single stage Ta, T1 papillary carcinoma of the bladder[J]. J Urol, 1993; 149(4): 749-752. |
20. | [19]Raitanen MP, Lukkarinen O. A controlled study of intravesical EPI rubicin with or without alpha 2b-interferon as prophylaxis for recurrent superficial transitonal cell carcinoma of the bladder. Finnish Multicentre Study Group [J ]. Br J Urol,1995; 76(6): 697-701. |
21. | [20]Rajala P, Liukkonen T, Raitanen M. Transurethral resection with perioperative instilation on interferon ~ alpha or EPI rubicin for the prophylaxis of recurrent primary superficial bladder cancer: a prospective randomized multicenter study-Finnbladder III[J]. J Urol, 1999; 161(4): 1133-1136. |
22. | [21]The Hokkaido University Bladder Cancer Collaborative Group. Prophylactic chemotherapy with anthracyclines ( adriamycin, EPI rubicin, and pirarubicin) for primary superficial bladder cancer[J]. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol, 1994; 35(Suppl): S41-45. |
23. | [22]Cutler SJ, Heney NM, Friedell GH. Longitudinal studyofpatients with bladder cancer: fators associated with disease recurrence and progression [ M ] . AUA Monographs, Bladder Cancer. Press: Williams&Wilkis,vol. 1; chapt. 4, p. 35, 1982. |
24. | [23]Heney NM, Ahmed S, Flanagan MJ. Superficial bladder cancer:progression and recurrence[J]. J urol,1983; 130:1 083-1 086. |
25. | [24]Prout GR, Bassil B, Griffin P. The treated histories of patients with Ta grade 1 transitional-cell carcinoma of the bladder [J].Arch Surg,1986;121 (72) :1 463. |
- 1. [25]Cumming JA, Kirk D, Newling DW. A multicentre phase Ⅱ study of intravesical EPI rubicin in the treatment of superficial bladder tumor[J]. Eur Urol, 1990;17(31) :20.
- 2. [1]Lum BL, Torti. Adjuvant intravesical pharmacology for superficial bladder cancer[J]. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1991; 83:682-694.
- 3. [2]Jerome P, Ricie MD. Intravesical chemotherapy treatment selection, techniques and results [J ]. Urological Clinics of North America,1992; 19(3): 521-527.
- 4. [3]Arnling CL. Diagnosis and management of superficial bladder cancer[J], Curr Probl Cancer, 2001; 25(4): 219-278.
- 5. [4]Mulrow CD, Oxman AD. The cochrane Collaboration hand book[ M]. Issue1, 2000, Oxford,Update Sofeware.
- 6. [5]Jadad AR, Moore A, Carroll D. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary[J].Control Clin Trials, 1996; 17:1-12.
- 7. [6]Kjaergard LL, Villumsen J, Gluud C. Quality of randomized clinical trials affects estimates of intervention efficacy[ A]. In:Vll Cochrane Colloquium [C], Rome 1999,p:57.
- 8. [7]Moher D, Pham B, Jones A, Cook DJ, Jadad AR, Moher M.Does quality of reports of randomized trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyes [ J ]. Lancet. 1998; 352(21 ) :609-613.
- 9. [8]Clarke M, Oxman AD. Editors. Cochrane Reviewers Handbook 4.0 [ updated July 1999 ]; Section 6 [ M ]. In: The Cochrane Library[ database on CD/ROM]. The Cochrane Collaboration. Oxford: Update Software, 2000: Issue 1.
- 10. [9]Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Hayes R, Altman D. Empirical evidence of bias[J ]. JAMA, 1995; 273 (35) :408-412.
- 11. [10]Vander Meijden AP, Kurth KH, Oosterlinck W. Intravesical therapy with adriamycin and 4-EPI rubicin for superficial bladder cancer: the experience of the EOR TC GU Group[J].Cancer Chemother Pharmacol, 1992; 30 (Suppl): S95-98.
- 12. [11]Maekawa S, Suzuki H, Ohkubo K. Continuous intravesical instillation of EPI rubicin immediately after transurethral resection of superficial bladder cancer: a prospective controlled study[J]. Hinyokika Kiyo, 2000; 46(5): 301-306.
- 13. [12]Aliel DB, el Baz M, Aly AN. Intravesical EPI rubicin versus doxorubicin for superficial bladder tumors (stages pTa and pT1 ): a randomized prospective study[J]. J Urol, 1997; 158(1): 68-74.
- 14. [13]Aliel DB, Nabeeh A, el Baz M, et al. Single ~ dose versus multiple instillations of EPI rubicin as prophylaxis for recurrence after transurethral resection of pTa and pT1 transitionalcell bladder tumours: a prospective, randomized controlled study[J]. Br J Urol, 1997; 79(5): 731-735.
- 15. [14]Hirao Y, Ozono S, Momose H. Prospective randomized study of prophylaxis of superficial bladder cancer with EPI rubicin: the role of a central pathology laboratory[J]. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol, 1994; 35 Suppl: S36-40.
- 16. [15]Melekos MD, Dauaher H, Fokaefs E. Intravesical instillations of4-EPI-doxorubicin (EPI rubicin) in the prophylactic treatment of superficial bladder cancer: results of a controlled prospective study[J]. J Urol, 1992; 147(2): 371-375.
- 17. [16]Melekos MD, Chionis HS, Paranychianakis GS. Intravesical 4-EPI-doxorubicin (EPI rubicin) versus bacillus Calmette-Guerin. A controlled prospective study on the prophylaxis of superficial bladder cancer[J]. Cancer, 1993; 72(5): 1 749-1755.
- 18. [17]Okamura K, Murase T, Obata K. A randomized trial of early intravesical instillation ofEPI rubicin in uperficial bladder cancer[J]. Cancer ChemotherPharnacol, 1994; Suppl: S31-35.
- 19. [18]Oosterlinck W, Kurth KH, Schroder F. A prospective European Organization for R.esearch and Treatment of Cancer Genitourinary Group randomized trial comparing transurethral resection followed by a single intravesical instillation of EPI rubicin or water in single stage Ta, T1 papillary carcinoma of the bladder[J]. J Urol, 1993; 149(4): 749-752.
- 20. [19]Raitanen MP, Lukkarinen O. A controlled study of intravesical EPI rubicin with or without alpha 2b-interferon as prophylaxis for recurrent superficial transitonal cell carcinoma of the bladder. Finnish Multicentre Study Group [J ]. Br J Urol,1995; 76(6): 697-701.
- 21. [20]Rajala P, Liukkonen T, Raitanen M. Transurethral resection with perioperative instilation on interferon ~ alpha or EPI rubicin for the prophylaxis of recurrent primary superficial bladder cancer: a prospective randomized multicenter study-Finnbladder III[J]. J Urol, 1999; 161(4): 1133-1136.
- 22. [21]The Hokkaido University Bladder Cancer Collaborative Group. Prophylactic chemotherapy with anthracyclines ( adriamycin, EPI rubicin, and pirarubicin) for primary superficial bladder cancer[J]. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol, 1994; 35(Suppl): S41-45.
- 23. [22]Cutler SJ, Heney NM, Friedell GH. Longitudinal studyofpatients with bladder cancer: fators associated with disease recurrence and progression [ M ] . AUA Monographs, Bladder Cancer. Press: Williams&Wilkis,vol. 1; chapt. 4, p. 35, 1982.
- 24. [23]Heney NM, Ahmed S, Flanagan MJ. Superficial bladder cancer:progression and recurrence[J]. J urol,1983; 130:1 083-1 086.
- 25. [24]Prout GR, Bassil B, Griffin P. The treated histories of patients with Ta grade 1 transitional-cell carcinoma of the bladder [J].Arch Surg,1986;121 (72) :1 463.